Lady Marmalade Adult parties in London
TELEPHONE: 07805 599001 /07805 599036

   
3 of 3
3
The Dream Team
Posted: 08 November 2009 11:16 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 31 ]  
Jr. Member
RankRank
Total Posts:  36
Joined  2009-09-24

haha! “crown jewels” no pun-intended
eh bigguy? lol! i love it! everybody i’m
sure has a preference *each to their
own right*? but i believe every girl
that parties is different in
appearence, personality and how we
party. but at the end of the day thats
what makes LMP such a brilliant place
as you have so much diversity and
mixture grin everyone add’s something.
grin i think all the girls are lovely,
gorgeous and skilled ladies!
LOVE YOU ALL GIRLS! xxx

 Signature 

XxX JEWELS XxX

Profile
 
 
Posted: 09 November 2009 01:23 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 32 ]  
Newbie
Rank
Total Posts:  2
Joined  2009-11-09

I posted the controversial FR. Honestly, I had no idea what kind of fuss it would cause.

Firstly, sincere and grovelling apologies to Sarah, I am useless at guessing womens’ ages and I should keep such speculation to myself in future as whatever one says can (and in this case did) cause offence.

In answer to Em I think you are right in the sense that singling out any individual lady as being somehow “better” than the others can inevitably lead to the conclusion that some are of a lesser standard.

Nevertheless what I said was purely a matter of personal opinion. Having experienced the pleasures of many different ladies over many years all over the world I feel somewhat qualified to draw my own conclusions.

Some ladies get more involved than others and that’s down to personal style, chemistry with the punter and any number of other elements. I do believe that some women are more temperamentally suited to this kind of work than others. Some deal with it by detaching themselves, closing their eyes and no doubt thinking about their household chores or whatever. Others maintain eye contact, engage and actively encourage and participate.

My opinion is that while none of the ladies in your employ can remotely be described as a “B” team or whatever, and all are in fact pretty damn good (I really mean it), some do stand out from the rest and I was simply giving credit where credit was due.

You deserve a great deal of respect for what you have achieved in reaching and maintaining the current standard.

In answer to the criticisms of my report style, I read some of the previous FRs and felt that they were insufficiently detailed. I could have written it in any number of different ways and deliberately chose to do it the way I did. I don’t like vague FRs where someone just says they had a good time, nor do I particularly like very detailed blow-by-blow Penthouse sex reports. I want to know if the lady provides good, honest and reliable service and meets or exceeds expectations. I stuck to the facts as I observed them and selectively added my own subjective opinions.

I do not understand those who exchange money for sexual services and then get uneasy if someone “objectifies” the working girls. You are choosing to use the women to gratify your sexual lust and in return compensating them with cash. It’s a fair deal if all parties are happy with the arrangement. Essentially you are using the women as sex objects. Provided you treat them respectfully, pay your money and behave yourself, that’s OK. It might be a party atmosphere, but see it for what it is, just a form of window dressing, and rather good at that.

To end this long and somewhat rambling post, I feel that LMP have created something special and different and have enjoyed my time there very much. Nothing in this world is perfect and cannot be criticised. I made what I felt were legitimate observations and I would encourage anyone who has not been to go along and see for themselves.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 09 November 2009 12:34 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 33 ]  
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  204
Joined  2009-05-09

Hugh

Thanks for coming on here to explain your point of view.  I do think this has turned into a very interesting thread and confirms my view that LMP parties are something special.

I do agree with Moss and tsm that you’ll enjoy yourself at LMP much more if you forget the payment bit and just concentrate on the people you’ll meet.  Obviously, I don’t know if this is entirely true but I’ve rarely come across any girls at LMP who aren’t basically there for a good sexy time.  That’s great for us blokes because it means we can be open and frank about our desires in a way that society doesn’t generally let us.  I assume it’s great for the girls too both financially but more importantly sexually.

I’ve been to parties where the girls are primarily there for the money.  It’s just not the same.  I’ve known a party where the girls were changing back into their civvies with half an hour still to go.  By comparison, LMP offers beautiful women who enjoy sex in an atmosphere where all of us can relax in each other’s company and no-one’s going to object if they’re asked to go off to a bedroom for some fun.  They’re also going to be providing that fun until the very last minute as long as we men are up to the challenge.

The LMP girls are also great company which to me is as important as the sex.  As my recent posts probably show, my favourite girl at the moment is Cleo and I haven’t partied with her yet.  I met her at my last party but didn’t get round to her.  But I chatted to her and she’s a lovely girl and I’m really looking forward to correcting my omission next time.  That’s the sort of anticipation that always intensifies the experience of being with a girl whether with LMP or not.

So treat the girls as you would anyone else just in the knowledge that they will welcome being propositioned and you’ll have an even greater time than before.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 09 November 2009 12:36 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 34 ]  
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  204
Joined  2009-05-09

Oh, and I’m very pleased to see that this is such a popular thread because it’s great to be able to talk so openly and courteously about the subject.

and it helps me get nearer to be a junior member!

Profile
 
 
Posted: 09 November 2009 05:26 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 35 ]  
Newbie
Rank
Total Posts:  2
Joined  2009-11-09

Moss - My intention was not to insult anyone although you are entitled to take what I said in any way you like.

You have chosen to see the world in a particular way and that’s absolutely fine by me. You have to do what you have to do. One man can see a glass half full while another sees it half empty, it is the same glass. Whatever is the underlying Force that makes the ladies behave as they do, long may it continue.

It is a fact that in general men desire sex far more than women. Therefore men have evolved all kinds of strategies to get more women to have more sex with them. I believe, and there is some evidence for it, that men’s desire for women is the main driving force behind human development, wars, technological progress etc. Men drive themselves to achieve to gain status, property and thereby obtain greater access to women. Or you can short circuit this mechanism and simply buy your way in.

I believe that any relationships between men and women where cash is involved directly or near directly cross a line. That line is that there is not necessarily mutual desire or attraction, however both parties are getting something from the encounter. From the man’s point of view he is getting the woman’s time and attention. In return the woman is being compensated materially. I don’t believe there’s anything wrong with this but much of society disapproves. Men are supposed to restrain themselves and channel their desires in controlled and approved directions. Not all of us agree with that and seek other ways to express ourselves.

I think you also misunderstand my reference to women as sex objects. I neither see them as sex objects nor treat them as such. In life, I am sure we all know you will get far further by treating others with respect and consideration to the greatest possible extent and this is what I aim to do. I am always polite and respectful of the ladies and treat them as human beings. In the context of exchanging money however indirectly for the possibility of sexual favours I think we men are in denial if we think that doing it doesn’t objectify women in some sense. That’s just the way I see it.

My comments about money in the FR were, on reflection, inappropriate and did miss the point. I was trying to make a point about value for money, rather clumsily. You cannot reduce an experience like an LMP party down to a “cost per punt.” The whole in this case is far greater than the sum of the parts and for that I think we are all very grateful indeed.

Profile
 
 
   
3 of 3
3
 
‹‹ Tuesday 3rd Nov evening      4th Nov 1pm ››