I put in a field report on Punternet this morning on yesterdays MILF party. This was rejected because it “Violated FR rules”! What a suprise! NOT!
I know i had done one nearly a year ago, but you are supposed to be able to do another on the same venue as long as the previous one was older than 3 months!
Basically, i think Punternet SUCKS! No wonder most people don’t bother with reporting, apart from their favourites that is!
Or am i just cynical? Conspiricy theory?
Martin,
It’s a bit of a bee in my bonnet, but Galahad some time ago changed the ruling on multi reporting, now you can only have one reprt per punter per lady or establishment. Some years ago punters were putting unlimited FR’s for the same lady it was repitive and bordering on touting. So Galahad bought in the one report rule. Many have asked that he reconsider, and maybe allow another report after perhaps a year or so, but I doubt if he’ll change.
Is it me or since the recent PN rumble we seem to have a lot more newbies popping up with questions who all commit to coming after being re-assured - funny that….
Martin,
It’s a bit of a bee in my bonnet, but Galahad some time ago changed the ruling on multi reporting, now you can only have one reprt per punter per lady or establishment. Some years ago punters were putting unlimited FR’s for the same lady it was repitive and bordering on touting. So Galahad bought in the one report rule. Many have asked that he reconsider, and maybe allow another report after perhaps a year or so, but I doubt if he’ll change.
I read the rules again & your right Phil! I could have got round it by requesting they remove the 1st report & re-submit another in a few days time! But why bother. The thing that annoys me is that i’m not trying to tout LMP, i’m just an honest punter that is trying to inform others of my pleasurable experiences! Guess i’ll stick to posting that on this forum then! Preaching to the converted!
Is it me or since the recent PN rumble we seem to have a lot more newbies popping up with questions who all commit to coming after being re-assured - funny that….
Seems that way Stevie! A bit of free advertising & stirring up interest in LMP? Its back fired on their intentions & the price rise has obviously not put people off!
I like having the odd new guy at parties i’m at! Being a bit of a “people watcher” i like to see their reactions! Some are quite funny!
well, after starting of by pretending to be a disgruntled party goer our good friend oifarang finally showed his true colours
what a wanker - or at least if he was a partygoer rather than a plant by the enemy then what a wanker he is about to become - with that being his only option now
i wonder oifarang, if you read this forum then why didnt you post on here - you’re so obvious its unbelievable
well, after starting of by pretending to be a disgruntled party goer our good friend oifarang finally showed his true colours
what a wanker - or at least if he was a partygoer rather than a plant by the enemy then what a wanker he is about to become - with that being his only option now
i wonder oifarang, if you read this forum then why didnt you post on here - you’re so obvious its unbelievable
Well, Well! I got one more reply to oifarang on the punternet forum, after he had a go at me, (Phil Atio had already put him right anyway, thx Phil) & not long after that their moderators locked the thread. I checked this morning & the whole thread has been removed! Funny that hey?
If nothing else it created a good forum thread & created interest & chat, so for that oifarang, thanks mate! XXX
The price point of £120 was good for a lot of people as they could persuade themselves that is was really “around” £100.
£140, although only £20 more is psychologically “around” £150. So for a £20 increase, psychologically a lot of people see it as almost half as much again - a much larger increase.
The last few parties I’ve been to was not full and I think a lot of blokes like the 2.1 ratio actually more than the 1.5 or even 1.1 ironically. .
So here’s a suggestion.
Stick to £140 on popular parties which tend to sell out where demand exceeds supply, and reduce the number of girls to 5 or 6 and therefore capacity to 10 or 12 on less popular days/times and keep the £120 price.
I’ll let the management reply properly to that one but as Moss points out he has has no idea which parties are going to be the more popular - sometimes it will be 15 mins before kick-off and he will have 4 guys in - and then the phone goes mad as others clear their schedules and at kick-off they might have 10 or even 12 - there is no way to tell - and which girls do you cut if its not full - the LMP philosphy has always been to always have 7 girls and take the hit on quieter parties as over the 7 days it balances out…...and no-one feels left out….they have been doing this for over 5 years so they must be doing something right…
Your points are valid but I know most of us regulars are fine with the way things are - swings and roundabouts ect….
As far as i’m concerned don’t mess with something that so obviously works!
The number of girls/ratio is second to none for the cost.
If you want less girls & less party contribution, try monday MILF parties, then your “psychological closer to £100” is happy.
I must say that i’m seeing a big, big increase in new guys coming to LMP, so cost v’s quality must be ok?
If not happy at the contribution, then i’m sure you can vote with your feet, as the consumer, & try cheaper/higher ratio parties.
As stevie pointed out, its impossible to say which party will be busy & which is quiet! So perhaps we could have all the girls turn up just in case its busy, & if not, we could pick which ones to stay & tell the others to go home? (Sarcasm!)
Maybe i did? Maybe i did’nt? Who knows the secret of the black magic box? 
