TELEPHONE: 07805 599001 /07805 599036

trysomemore - 13 January 2010 09:50 AM

Hey Martin that sounds like we welcome newbies for a laugh! - I know you didn’t mean that but it just amused me

  Maybe i did? Maybe i did’nt? Who knows the secret of the black magic box? 

And all because the lady loves…....well whatever she fancies I’ll give it a go

Its got to be done! & it may as well be us!

well, after starting of by pretending to be a disgruntled party goer our good friend oifarang finally showed his true colours

what a wanker - or at least if he was a partygoer rather than a plant by the enemy then what a wanker he is about to become - with that being his only option now

i wonder oifarang, if you read this forum then why didnt you post on here - you’re so obvious its unbelievable

bigguy - 14 January 2010 05:12 PM

well, after starting of by pretending to be a disgruntled party goer our good friend oifarang finally showed his true colours

what a wanker - or at least if he was a partygoer rather than a plant by the enemy then what a wanker he is about to become - with that being his only option now

i wonder oifarang, if you read this forum then why didnt you post on here - you’re so obvious its unbelievable

Well said Biggie, well said Sir…

Well, Well! I got one more reply to oifarang on the punternet forum, after he had a go at me, (Phil Atio had already put him right anyway, thx Phil) & not long after that their moderators locked the thread. I checked this morning & the whole thread has been removed! Funny that hey?
If nothing else it created a good forum thread & created interest & chat, so for that oifarang, thanks mate! XXX

Good riddance!!

My, my there has been some fun behind the bike sheds while I’ve been away.

Settle down children, it’s time for the discipline classes of Mistresses Antonia, Charli and Cleo!

oifarang’s up first, and I do hope this time he has done his homework…

Hello Moss

The price point of £120 was good for a lot of people as they could persuade themselves that is was really “around” £100.

£140, although only £20 more is psychologically “around” £150. So for a £20 increase, psychologically a lot of people see it as almost half as much again -  a much larger increase. 

The last few parties I’ve been to was not full and I think a lot of blokes like the 2.1 ratio actually more than the 1.5 or even 1.1 ironically.  .

So here’s a suggestion.

Stick to £140 on popular parties which tend to sell out where demand exceeds supply, and reduce the number of girls to 5 or 6 and therefore capacity to 10 or 12 on less popular days/times and keep the £120 price.

I’ll let the management reply properly to that one but as Moss points out he has has no idea which parties are going to be the more popular - sometimes it will be 15 mins before kick-off and he will have 4 guys in - and then the phone goes mad as others clear their schedules and at kick-off they might have 10 or even 12 - there is no way to tell - and which girls do you cut if its not full - the LMP philosphy has always been to always have 7 girls and take the hit on quieter parties as over the 7 days it balances out…...and no-one feels left out….they have been doing this for over 5 years so they must be doing something right…

Your points are valid but I know most of us regulars are fine with the way things are - swings and roundabouts ect….

As far as i’m concerned don’t mess with something that so obviously works!
The number of girls/ratio is second to none for the cost.
If you want less girls & less party contribution, try monday MILF parties, then your “psychological closer to £100” is happy.
I must say that i’m seeing a big, big increase in new guys coming to LMP, so cost v’s quality must be ok?
If not happy at the contribution, then i’m sure you can vote with your feet, as the consumer, & try cheaper/higher ratio parties.
As stevie pointed out, its impossible to say which party will be busy & which is quiet! So perhaps we could have all the girls turn up just in case its busy, & if not, we could pick which ones to stay & tell the others to go home? (Sarcasm!)

Flashman

Many thanks for your suggestion.

I say I welcome any suggestions and and give them consideration and I truely do. The problem is replying to those I don’t agree with. I don’t want to appear defensive or dismissive. As with many sensible suggestions such as yours, I can see where you are coming from. However, I see things from a differant place, possessing information you do not.

I won’t defend the price rise as I have explained the reasons behind it previously and I don’t want to cover old ground.

What I will say is that without wishing to be rude, you are basing your opinion on a ‘few’ parties you have attended recently. I base my opinions and decisions on 16 parties weekly, every week and I have the full data on attendance, breakdown of newbies v returnees, numbers for this quarter against same quarter last year etc (bit geeky but used to be in management and had to do KPIs!)

Some simple stats are the first quarter of last year, when prices where £120, we were not full every party and in fact, averaged less per party than this quarter.

The week just ended, we had more full parties than ones with spaces and on Thursday had to have 8 girls at the evening party to cope with bookings!

As Stevie said, it is imposible to predict the numbers expected for a party as majority of bookings come on the day and no day or party time is consistantly quieter/ busier than anyother. Guys attend because they want to party with 7 girls and know they will, no matter how many other guys are there. Dare I say it, if they want to attend a party with less girls and cheaper price, they already have options elsewhere

Fact is that we believe the current formula works, stats back us up and whilst we never stop examining, we don’t want to change a formula that is working.

See you at a party soon

Moss

i fancy a bit of maths meself

£120/7 girls = approx £17 per girl

£140/7 girls = £20 a girl

so if you attend a party thats £3 extra per girl there - tbh £20 is about 3 beers in the pub

so its a simple toss up between 3 beers and 7 lovelies

i dont think the nhs could ever come up with a better system to get people off the booze

I did feel at the time of the contribution increase that 40 quid on the 4 hour parties was a bit steep, as in percentage terms this equates to 20%, but as has been pointed out this is the first increase in a few years. After a lot of thought and a few parties it still represents good value.

My view is that LMP is top quality for many reasons, virtually all the girls I’ve partied with have a great attitude, and are always ready to play. The premises are safe and first class, with loads of space and I’ve always like the “recovery area” up stairs. Em, Moss, Chris & T&T ensure everything runs smoothly, plus there’s a good craic with most of the guys I’ve met via this forum, and partied with as a nervous newbie at my first party a year or so back.

I perhaps should try other party providers to compare with LMP, but with some of the plants that appear on PN makes me unsure as their motives and reliabilty.

Phil Atio - 03 April 2010 07:41 AM

I did feel at the time of the contribution increase that 40 quid on the 4 hour parties was a bit steep, as in percentage terms this equates to 20%

It was a £20 increase Phil. It used to be £220 now £240 for a 4 hr or double.

Even more reason to do the double!