trysomemore - 05 February 2010 05:35 AM
I think Colly’s point is that by only allowing the condoms provided ‘in-house’ there is no need to do any checking or quality control. It is not a case of questioning the quality of Durex or Trojan more a sensible safety precaution.
Yes, ok, but the things are in airtight packets, hence, quality control with ‘in-house’ LMP condoms, is no different from quality control with the ones that may people bring.
If anything the likes of trojan or durex (because they are more expensive) are likely to be better than ‘in-house’ LMP ones – as LMP does of course buy in bulk.
The logic of my point is this: the incentives are layout in such a way that if people brought there own, they would only have an incentive to bring better ones than those that are already freely available.
If you wanted a final control, then the rule could be that, you ask the girl, she looks to see it is a recognised brand and makes her choice (or the LMP policy choice) based on that information.
By the way, I am not, say I am dissatisfied with ‘in-house’, I am just tying to put forward a rational point.